1. Won't extension of lifespan increase population and tax our planet's resources?
Actually, without life extension the reverse is actually possible. World population growth rates have been falling precipitously since 1960. Many western countries will soon begin to feel the effects of these drops.Because of increasing modernization, It is very likely that world population will stabilize by 2050 and may even begin to fall.This will represent a challenge to nations as their populations grow older and they scramble to prevent wide spread labor shortages.Back to Top
In addition, as technology extends lives, it makes life more livable for larger populations. Since the Industrial Revolution, alarmists have screamed doom and gloom about overcrowding and limited resources (backed by misinterpreted "statistics"). However, the opposite has happened. The population increased by 750% since then, and standards of living soared. It's not so much a question of resources as education, individual productivity and distribution - social engineering problems, not life extension problems. As long as people produce more than they consume, it's impossible to run out of resources.Back to Top
However, even though our known resources could support at least 6 billion more people, these concerns should be addressed. Reducing the birth rate rather than depriving people of a chance to live longer might be a better concern.Back to Top
2. Are there ethical problems with longevity research?
What about antibiotics, organ transplants, laser surgery and all the other "miracles" we take for granted today? We heard these same arguments against such advances as anesthesiology for childbirth. Should we not use the ability to alleviate human pain and suffering if we have it? Shouldn't we give everyone the opportunity to choose a longer, healthier life? Wouldn't it be immoral to suppress life giving technologies?
Cancer, heart disease and tooth decay and are part of the aging process. Is any rational person against curing or avoiding those?
3. Why would anyone want to live forever?
"Forever" is a long time, and we're not suggesting that. Most people who enjoy life can't get enough of it. Even most of those who claim they don't want to live longer than "natural" will go to the ends of the earth to cure themselves of cancer, heart disease and injuries when they get stricken. Modern drugs, surgical techniques and diagnostic tools are life extension technologies that few refuse.Back to Top
4. Shouldn't we spend our resources feeding the hungry, rather than keeping people alive longer?
Our best resource is knowledge. The elderly own most of it. By making them productive for extra years, many of those resources can be channeled to solving problems such as hunger. Besides, our planet can accommodate over 6 billion more people before resources are taxed. This doesn't account for future technologies such as new clean energy sources, enhanced food production, efficient water desalinization, and nanotechnology.Back to Top
5. How can you expect to solve something as complex as aging, when we can't even cure cancer?
For a couple of reasons. We already have some pretty compelling clues as to what causes aging. Enough, in fact, to put our version of a biological "Manhattan Project" to work right now. We even know how to extend average life spans by up to 20 years in many people. Recent giant technology and computational leaps give us the tools today that made unraveling the aging process an unrealistic project just a few years ago. These tools will only get better.Back to Top
6. Won't longer life spans threaten the Social Security system, Medicare and pension plans?
Yes, as they're structured today. But remember, average life spans have increased steadily and dramatically most of this century. In fact, average life spans increased by 32 years since 1900. Governments and industry successfully adjusted to it. Change sometimes hurts, but aren't millions of premature deaths a high price to pay to keep retirement and entitlement plans static? Besides, shouldn't each individual be offered that choice for his or her life? Wouldn't it be immoral to suppress or withhold life-extending technology, because some people want to protect the status quo?
7. What will we do with all the "old people"?
"Old people" can be our most valuable resources. We generally acquire more experience, knowledge, wisdom and skills as we age. Rather than putting us "out to pasture" or in nursing homes, wouldn't society be better off if we kept ourselves youthful and productive? 32% of our country's medical expenses are spent on the elderly (over age 69). Annual healthcare costs for people over 65 years of age are 400% of those 65 years of age and younger.Back to Top
8. You don't need modern technology. Won't meditation, yoga, exercise, faith and pure food, air and water accomplish the same thing?
Only to a degree. These can all help us live longer, but so far, no one in today's society has ever been proven to live beyond 122 years. We hope to extend the maximum life span, while allowing people to be active and youthful well into "old" age. Meanwhile, keep up your healthy habits such as exercising regularly with these Fat Burning Workouts as well as keeping a well balanced dietBack to Top
9. What causes aging?
There are several different theories on what causes aging. It is known that free radicals cause damage to many different systems in your body, so this might be one major cause. There is a cellular aging clock, the telomere that seems to shut down some cell types as we age. Your immune system stops functioning correctly, leading to increased chances of external and internal damage. You stop producing some vital hormones as you age, also causing some systems to not function correctly. The good news for biological researchers is that these different causes all overlap in their effects. The bad news is we have yet to sort out which is the root cause.Back to Top
10. Name some of the most promising research going on now.
There is a tremendous amount of research going on right now. Recently, a group at the University of Wisconsin developed a technique to locate many genes that are involved in the aging process in mice. This may soon allow us to control the aging process itself. At Geron, a biotechnology company, researchers have been working on shutting off the cellular aging clock, the telomere. There are far too many examples to list them all.Back to Top
11. When do you expect aging to be cured?
We can only make an educated guess. So much depends on raising enough money, and more importantly - seeing that it's invested in the right projects and making sure the researchers are motivated and focused. Some researchers predict aging can be stopped within 15 years or less if they had the resources to do so. Some of those feel they can actually reverse aging in about 20 years. Some more conservative scientists set their sights on a 20-40 year time frame. Some think it will take much longer. Maximum Life Foundationís plan is by 2029. Most agree it will be done in stages, first slowing aging, then stopping it... then reversing it. Others have a sensible plan to fix the damage aging does, effectively reversing aging in less than 20 years, rather than solving the aging riddles. Most agree it will be easier to extend the average life span before extending the maximum life span. Some experts predict an integration of the biological sciences will happen first, then completely controlling aging happening shortly thereafter.Back to Top
12. How much will it cost to control the human aging process?
This is another unknown. Some set the figure as low as $100 to $300 million... less than it takes to develop and bring a new drug to market. Others think it will take $100 billion. Others think over $1 trillion. Some very savvy experts think it will be under $2 billion if invested properly. Maximum Life Foundation thinks it can be done much closer to the $2 billion figure.Back to Top
13. Who says stopping the aging process is possible?
Most molecular and cell biologists feel that once we have a good understanding of the majority of our genes and the proteins they produce, controlling the aging process is inevitable. The human body is a wonderfully complex machine. Deciphering the aging process is simply a matter of figuring out how that machine works.Back to Top
14. How and where is the money the Maximum Life Foundation raises spent?
We target private research, if it looks promising as well as university based research. Our Scientific Advisory Board reviews research for merit, and our Board of Directors then decides on final allocations. We hold researchers strictly accountable for results. No results, no more support. Results get rewarded with more support.
We are also establishing a "Prize Fund" that will target specific aging research goals and award the first researchers to achieve them.Back to Top
Finally, an important part of our program is an "awareness" campaign. By educating the public on the possibilities of controlling the aging process, we increase grass roots support and funding... and the possibilities of private corporations jumping on the life extension bandwagon and pouring vast resources into anti-aging research around the world. Our goal is to have someone put the final pieces of the aging puzzle together... and obsolete the need for our Foundation.Back to Top
15. What can I do now to slow, stop or reverse my own aging?
We have the knowledge and therapies to significantly extend the average human life span right now. Some are as simple as changing your diet, getting regular moderate amounts of exercise and learning to relax. Some more advanced steps are adding supplements to your diet. More aggressive steps could be hormone supplementation and taking selected drugs that may have "anti-aging" properties. For a more complete report, refer to Maximum Life Foundation's "Life Extension Express".Back to Top
16. Why isn't the government doing it?
The NIH does support some anti-aging research. We don't see much evidence of the government being successful in solving major medical problems though. We feel it's going to take a more streamlined entrepreneurial approach. Therefore, The Maximum Life Foundation supports university based and private sector programs.Back to Top
17. What can I do to help?
By joining the Maximum Life Foundation, you could assist with fundraising events, general awareness and by setting an example for friends and loved ones by adopting a healthy life style. You could encourage others to take steps that could increase their health and longevity. These are illustrated in Maximum Life Foundation's free book "Life Extension Express".Back to Top
18. Won't life be boring if we lived for a long time?
Maybe. If life bores you now, living longer might not help. But it might. Imagine an extended future with unlimited resources, energy, health and wealth. Imagine the possibility of private space travel, undersea exploration and few survival pressures.Back to Top
19. Would life extending therapies be safe?
Like any other new drugs and treatments for various diseases, they will go through extensive trials before reaching the general public.Back to Top
Life extension therapies would probably be much safer than most risky medical techniques used today. Our understanding of how the human body works is expanding everyday, and therefore newer treatments are more reasoned than ones used previously. Besides, what do you have to lose? The side effect to doing nothing is death.Back to Top
20. I'm already ____ years old. Isn't it too late for me?
Not necessarily. By following Maximum Life Foundation's life style guidelines with your doctor's supervision, there's every reason to hope to add extra vibrant years to your life. Every extra day we live moves us one day closer to the next anti-aging breakthrough. One could happen tomorrow. Even if you have a serious illness, incorporating a healthy lifestyle with your medical treatments could increase your odds of a quicker recovery.
21. Why do some people refer to aging as a "disease"?
Aging is in reality a collection of degenerative diseases. As a group, these diseases (heart disease, cancer, type II diabetes, Alzheimer's, etc.) result in the less than optimal function of the human body which eventually leads to death. At one time or another in history all of these conditions were considered "natural processes"Back to Top