Longevity NewsA Milestone of the Centuryposted on June 08, 2010While this news did not push war, political and disaster news off the front page, it did get relatively wide attention… but not what it deserves. This feat will certainly change the way we manage our health, and it promises even broader implications. Most people who embrace science and progress celebrated the news. Some of the others had knee jerk reactions over the implications of “interfering with nature” rather than trying to understand the benefits of what nature teaches us to improve humanity. Sadly, the rest never heard the news. I have reproduced excerpts of an article from www.edge.org. ON "CREATION OF A BACTERIAL CELL CONTROLLED BY A CHEMICALLY SYNTHESIZED GENOME" BY VENTER ET AL" "I feel sure of only one conclusion. The ability to design and create new forms of life marks a turning-point in the history of our species and our planet." — Freeman Dyson On May 20th, J. Craig Venter and his team at J.C Venter Institute announced the creation of a cell controlled by a synthetic genome in a paper published in SCIENCE. As science historian George Dyson points out, "from the point of view of technology, a code generated within a digital computer is now self-replicating as the genome of a line of living cells. From the point of view of biology, a code generated by a living organism has been translated into a digital representation for replication, editing and transmission to other cells." Physicist Freeman Dyson, commenting on the paper, notes that "the sequencing and synthesizing DNA give us all the tools we need to create new forms of life". But it remains to be seen how it will serve in practice. While it is correct to say that the individual cell was not created, a new line of cells (dare one say species?) was generated. This is new life that is self-propagating, i.e. "the cells with only the synthetic genome are self replicating and capable of logarithmic growth." The paper concludes with the following: Lower synthesis costs combined with automation will enable broad applications for synthetic genomics. Will the new techniques described in the paper allow us to bring extinct species back to life? Generating a Neanderthal, giving the recent mapping, seems to be feasible, but it will raise ethical hackles. Don't hold your breath waiting for someone to try it Generating a woolly mammoth will not be an ethical problem but it seems also seems feasible by using an elephant's placenta: inject mammoth DNA into modern elephant egg from which elephant DNA has been removed — import the elephant egg into an elephant. A real challenge will be to generate a truly extinct species such a Tasmanian wolf for which no host cells exist. What does this mean? We don't know yet, and we may not know for years. For now, all we can do is speculate responsibly. This will open the way to creating useful microbes from scratch to make products like vaccines and biofuels. At a press conference, Dr. Venter described the converted cell as “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.” Although this is not designing a new life form as some people believe, it is a major step in manipulating existing life forms. Life goes on ... but it won't be the same. If you’ve been reading this newsletter regularly, you know how and why biotech is largely becoming an infotech science. Each one of your 24,000 genes is essentially a computer guiding your biochemical processes. As we gain a better understanding of our biology, and while computer power doubles every year (growing exponentially so that an annual doubling rate equals over 1000 times more power in 10 years and well over 1 million times more powerful in 20), we will experience lightening-fast progress in life-extending capabilities. Hang on for the ride of your… Long Life, THE CARROT OF HAPPINESS from Reason A few thoughts on some of the underlying motivations for engineering a longer, healthier life: http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2010/06/the-carrot-of-happiness.php "The twin incentives for engineering greater human longevity: on the one hand, we have the stick of disease, degeneration, and suffering. On the other hand we have the carrot of a life that in all other aspects generally keeps getting better. Being older brings with it wisdom, knowledge, experience, and perhaps most importantly independence - the ability to be your own person and forge your own path. Youth is wasted on the young, as they say - so why not work at making youth available to everyone? It's the horror of the human condition that just as we get to the point of being practiced and elegant, the rug is pulled out from under us. But engineered healthy longevity is a very possible, plausible goal for this present age of biotechnology. Like all good things it requires work to realize: the longer we hang around not working on it, the longer it'll take to arrive." LATEST HEALTHY LIFE EXTENSION HEADLINES ALLEN HUMAN BRAIN ATLAS LAUNCHED (June 04 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4755 THE LOGICAL ENDPOINT OF NEUROINFORMATICS (June 04 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4754 EAT LESS, LIVE LONGER (June 03 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4753 The good news is that we might be able to delay aging without cutting our food intake. There's a definite possibility that if you balance the diet correctly, a longer lifespan can be achieved without full food restriction. It is unclear why eating less should make animals live longer. While a restricted diet triggers numerous changes at the molecular and genetic levels, only some of these are common across all the species tested. However, there does seem to be a general principle that a dearth of nutrients causes organisms to divert resources away from growth and reproduction and towards basic survival functions. From an evolutionary perspective, these adaptations could help an organism survive famine." A REVIEW OF TO AGE OR NOT TO AGE (June 02 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4750 PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS, EXERCISE, AND TELOMERE LENGTH (June 01 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4749 THE AGING OF ARTERIES (June 01 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4748 RESTRICTING BLOOD FLOW VERSUS SARCOPENIA (May 31 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4747 AN INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL WEST (May 31 2010) http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/vnl.cfm?id=4746 From Life Extension Magazine: "the name 'regenerative medicine' came from Bill Haseltine, then of Human Genome Sciences, one of the early leaders in genomics and DNA technology. Back in the 1990s, Bill learned that researchers in aging were making important progress on turning back the clock of aging in human cells through cloning, and then creating young cells that could potentially regenerate or repair all the tissues of the aged human body. And so, upon hearing of that realistic prospect, he christened the field 'regenerative medicine' in the belief that it would one day become a major part of medical practice. So, based on its origins, I would define regenerative medicine as that collection of technologies that utilizes embryonic pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives to regenerate tissues in the body ravaged from disease, primarily degenerative disorders associated with aging. The problem with human biology is that the immortal reproductive cells that built you and me develop into differentiated cells within our bodies and as a result, lose the capacity to proliferate (divide) forever. So, the cells of the body are mortal, meaning they have a finite life span, and as our tissues age, or deteriorate from disease, our body has a finite capacity to regenerate and repair those tissues. As a result, we suffer progressive declines in function that lead to our death." There is more to aging than this, however. Back to TopFunding Anti Aging Research | Life Extension Projects | Publications About Human Aging | Events to Reverse Aging | Longevity News |